Difference between revisions of "Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '''''Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis''''', 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]] [[Takings Clause]]. | + | In '''''Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis''''', 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that that a [[regulation]] banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]] [[Takings Clause]]. |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Fifth Amendment]] |
Latest revision as of 06:29, June 27, 2016
In Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis, 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.