Difference between revisions of "Intra-circuit conflict"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to become involved. | The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to become involved. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Federal Procedure]] |
Latest revision as of 14:24, July 13, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects certiorari jurisdiction based on an issue concerning intra-circuit conflict:
- Wisniewski v. United States, 353 U.S. 901, 902 (1957) (per curiam);
- Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 340 (1974) (certiorari not warranted despite conceded intra-circuit conflict on meaning of criminal statute).
The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to become involved.