Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gregor Mendel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Was he a Creationist?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! | + | The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! {{unsigned|Mcpannier}} |
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST) | How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | : Because nobody has added it yet? Here's your chance! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Was he a Creationist, as creation.com suggests? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:29, 30 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:29, July 30, 2010
The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcpannier (talk)
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--Snotbowst 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)
- Because nobody has added it yet? Here's your chance! Philip J. Rayment 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)
Was he a Creationist, as creation.com suggests? --Ed Poor Talk 15:29, 30 July 2010 (EDT)