Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexual belief system"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I would like to propose the deletion of this entry. It is putting words into the mouths of thousands of people. It does not even have any form of a source associated with it. This is blata...) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I would like to propose the deletion of this entry. It is putting words into the mouths of thousands of people. It does not even have any form of a source associated with it. This is blatant stereotyping and makes a blanket statement. | + | ==Proposal for Deletion== |
| + | I would like to propose the deletion of this entry. It is putting words into the mouths of thousands of people. It does not even have any form of a source associated with it. This is blatant stereotyping and makes a blanket statement. [[User:Kiss20 | Kiss20]] 22:48 EST 2/10/08 | ||
| + | :[[Conservapedia:Deletion Policy]] <br> | ||
| + | :<u>The Administrators are the final authority for deciding what should and should not be deleted on CP.</u> Some articles will NOT be deleted - no matter what your liberal heart desires. '''This article will not be deleted.''' --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 19:34, 11 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :The question is not the matter whether it is a liberal or conservative issue. The problem with this page is that it does not have a drop of encyclopedic content. It has no sources/references to an form of official creed. It is based on mere speculation by the author. This article has no basis, lacking even a basic statistical source. [[User:Kiss20|Kiss20]] 19:44, 11, February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Read above. Anyone criticizing this article's encyclopedic value has a [[liberal]] [[heart]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:04, 11 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::That or, just throwing this out there, they actually know what qualification as "encyclopedic" means? Encyclopedic is itself based on verifiable fact. [[User:Kiss20|Kiss20]] 22:07, 11 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | : I don't understand how pointing out a lack of sources give someone a liberal heart? [[User:MattF5034|MattF5034]] 01:30, 16 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | ==Revert== | ||
| + | Not true. Statistically, no study shows that people with religious motives persecute more than people who just hate them. If there is, please include. --[[User:David R|<font color="#0092FF">David R</font>]][[User talk:David R|<sup><font color="#FFCC00">talk</font></sup>]] 23:26, 10 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have added the appropriate reference. [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 23:28, 10 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Expansion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article could really use a good clear definition of the belief system, preceding the bullet list of characteristics. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:50, 26 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:30, October 16, 2009
Proposal for Deletion
I would like to propose the deletion of this entry. It is putting words into the mouths of thousands of people. It does not even have any form of a source associated with it. This is blatant stereotyping and makes a blanket statement. Kiss20 22:48 EST 2/10/08
- Conservapedia:Deletion Policy
- The Administrators are the final authority for deciding what should and should not be deleted on CP. Some articles will NOT be deleted - no matter what your liberal heart desires. This article will not be deleted. --Crocoite 19:34, 11 February 2008 (EST)
- The question is not the matter whether it is a liberal or conservative issue. The problem with this page is that it does not have a drop of encyclopedic content. It has no sources/references to an form of official creed. It is based on mere speculation by the author. This article has no basis, lacking even a basic statistical source. Kiss20 19:44, 11, February 2008 (EST)
- Read above. Anyone criticizing this article's encyclopedic value has a liberal heart. Feebasfactor 21:04, 11 February 2008 (EST)
- That or, just throwing this out there, they actually know what qualification as "encyclopedic" means? Encyclopedic is itself based on verifiable fact. Kiss20 22:07, 11 February 2008 (EST)
- I don't understand how pointing out a lack of sources give someone a liberal heart? MattF5034 01:30, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
Revert
Not true. Statistically, no study shows that people with religious motives persecute more than people who just hate them. If there is, please include. --David Rtalk 23:26, 10 February 2008 (EST)
I have added the appropriate reference. Rodney 23:28, 10 February 2008 (EST)
Expansion
This article could really use a good clear definition of the belief system, preceding the bullet list of characteristics. DouglasA 11:50, 26 July 2009 (EDT)