Difference between revisions of "User talk:Entheogenicorder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Your Edits) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I apologise, I did not realise I needed to be editing pages as well, I thought I would be okay discussing topics with people. I will try to add some relevant material as soon as I've done enough research to justify it, and will make sure I only use factual evidence - I don't want to offend anyone with more substantial edits either! Also I find it very difficult when most of the pages I would like to edit are locked for some reason, could you please explain this for me? [[User_talk:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 13:06, 5 February 2008 (BWT) | :I apologise, I did not realise I needed to be editing pages as well, I thought I would be okay discussing topics with people. I will try to add some relevant material as soon as I've done enough research to justify it, and will make sure I only use factual evidence - I don't want to offend anyone with more substantial edits either! Also I find it very difficult when most of the pages I would like to edit are locked for some reason, could you please explain this for me? [[User_talk:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 13:06, 5 February 2008 (BWT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Fidel Castro== | ||
| + | I've reverted the entire edit, because that's the way the software works. I'm all for a little balance, but the points you were making were not completely in accord with the facts. [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1973548/posts] The truth is that [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=399171&in_page_id=1787 ..."he's a megalomaniac who's run a corrupt, brutal and inefficient state that will collapse into criminality when he dies..."] [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 08:26, 21 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Okay, I'm sorry if some of the language I used was confusing, but I thought it was entirely fact based; I didn't deny at all that Castro's legacy has been tyrannical and I don't agree with it, but there was no mention in the main article about the positives. If I changed one or two of the sentences and left out the anti-democracy part, would it be allowed on here? [[User_talk:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 13:29, 21 February 2008 (BWT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, February 21, 2008
Your Edits
Entheogenicorder - you're currently violating the 90/10 rule (which is to prevent users from only editing talk pages). Keep in mind that we're building an encyclopedia here - and while talking can be helpful - you are required to have more substantial edits. See the Conservapedia:Commandments for more information.--IDuan 12:24, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- I apologise, I did not realise I needed to be editing pages as well, I thought I would be okay discussing topics with people. I will try to add some relevant material as soon as I've done enough research to justify it, and will make sure I only use factual evidence - I don't want to offend anyone with more substantial edits either! Also I find it very difficult when most of the pages I would like to edit are locked for some reason, could you please explain this for me? Entheogenicorder 13:06, 5 February 2008 (BWT)
Fidel Castro
I've reverted the entire edit, because that's the way the software works. I'm all for a little balance, but the points you were making were not completely in accord with the facts. [1] The truth is that ..."he's a megalomaniac who's run a corrupt, brutal and inefficient state that will collapse into criminality when he dies..." 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 08:26, 21 February 2008 (EST)
- Okay, I'm sorry if some of the language I used was confusing, but I thought it was entirely fact based; I didn't deny at all that Castro's legacy has been tyrannical and I don't agree with it, but there was no mention in the main article about the positives. If I changed one or two of the sentences and left out the anti-democracy part, would it be allowed on here? Entheogenicorder 13:29, 21 February 2008 (BWT)