Talk:Liberal supremacist

I made a minor Spelling/Grammar change to the article, but I wanted to clarify one somewhat ambiguous point - do liberal supremacists believe that possessing a liberal ideology renders them intellectually superior, or is the belief that they are intellectually superior a side-effect of the liberal ideology? Feebasfactor 11:58, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Having never met a "Liberal Supremacist", I doubt the first one and know the second isn't true. Barikada 13:01, 23 January 2008 (EST)

As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. I'll gladly change my view if i see one piece of proof.

To be fair, this term is on the list of "Conservapedia terms" that have been created for this site. Doing a quick google turned up 38 hits, all from blogs, except for CP's page (and frankly CP is essentially a fundamentalist blog with a bad desk encyclopedia attached.) CP is making no bones about this being a "made up" term, although they should probably make a category for these terms. Boomcoach 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Tautology

Isn't creating a term, then using your own essay as a citation, more than a bit circular? Boomcoach 13:48, 25 January 2008 (EST)

No, because only liberals are capable of [[deceit]], y'know. --MakeTomorrow 15:21, 25 January 2008 (EST)