Difference between revisions of "Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(The MSM won't report that these publications are supported mainly by liberals, but it can be deduced. Do you really think Ronald Reagan spent his spare time reading the Nation Enquirer?)
(→‎Entertainment: info added)
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Liberal celebrity obsession''' is the phenomenon of obessions over the lives of celebrities which is demonstrated mainly by individuals with [[liberal]] political leanings.
+
'''Liberal celebrity obsession''' is the phenomenon of obsessions over the lives of celebrities which is demonstrated mainly by individuals with [[liberal]] political leanings.
  
 
== Media ==
 
== Media ==
−
Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most mainstream media outlets. Often the [[leftist]] media will prioritize trivial celebrity activities over events with legitimate importance.  
+
Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most [[mainstream media]] outlets. Often the media will prioritize trivial [[celebrity]] activities over events with legitimate importance.  
  
 
'''Some examples include''':
 
'''Some examples include''':
 
*Excessive coverage of [[Paris Hilton]]'s jail sentence.
 
*Excessive coverage of [[Paris Hilton]]'s jail sentence.
−
*Excessive coverage of [[Anna Nicole Smith]] and the Liberal media's attempt at making her the next [[Marilyn Monroe]].
+
*Excessive coverage of [[Anna Nicole Smith]] and the liberal media's attempt at making her the next [[Marilyn Monroe]].
 
*Excessive coverage of [[Britney Spears]]' personal life.
 
*Excessive coverage of [[Britney Spears]]' personal life.
  
−
Liberals will often rather listen to the testimony of a celebrity such as [[George Clooney]] or [[Rosie O'Donnell]] when discussing matters such as [[Global Warming]]. However, when an expert with superior qualifications offers their opinion that contradicts the one of Clooney or O'Donnell, it must be the expert that is wrong; even though Clooney or O'Donnell have no scientific understanding of global warming whatsoever.
+
Liberals will often listen to the testimony of a celebrity such as [[Sheryl Crow]]<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/21/AR2007042101385_pf.html Saving the Earth: The Biodiesel Bus Blog]</ref> or [[Leonardo DiCaprio]]<ref>[http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarming/a/dicaprio.htm Leonardo DiCaprio to Produce Documentary on Global Warming]</ref> when discussing matters such as [[Global Warming]].
  
 
== Entertainment ==
 
== Entertainment ==
 +
Publications such as [[tabloid]]s and newsmagazine TV shows such as ''[[Entertainment Tonight]]'' garner most of their audience from the liberal population.  With this support, these enterprises are allowed to exist because they cater to the [[liberal]] appetite.
  
−
Publications such as tabloids and [[Entertainment Tonight]] garner most of their audience from the Liberal population. With this support, these enterprises are allowed to exist because they cater to the liberal appetite.
+
== Harmful Effects ==
 +
Liberal celebrity obsession can lead to dangerous behavior such as stalking. Some notable stalkers include [[John Hinckley]], [[Dawnette Knight]] and [[Ambrose Kappos]].  
  
−
[[Category:Liberals]]
+
Obsessed individuals may also place more importance in the activities of celebrities over the activities happening in their own lives.
 +
 
 +
{{See also|Hollywood values}}
 +
 
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist|2}}
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Liberalism]]
 
[[Category:Media]]
 
[[Category:Media]]
 +
[[Category:Hollywood Values]]
 +
[[Category:Essays]]
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Liberal celebrity obsession}}

Latest revision as of 13:23, March 13, 2021

Liberal celebrity obsession is the phenomenon of obsessions over the lives of celebrities which is demonstrated mainly by individuals with liberal political leanings.

Media

Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most mainstream media outlets. Often the media will prioritize trivial celebrity activities over events with legitimate importance.

Some examples include:

Liberals will often listen to the testimony of a celebrity such as Sheryl Crow[1] or Leonardo DiCaprio[2] when discussing matters such as Global Warming.

Entertainment

Publications such as tabloids and newsmagazine TV shows such as Entertainment Tonight garner most of their audience from the liberal population. With this support, these enterprises are allowed to exist because they cater to the liberal appetite.

Harmful Effects

Liberal celebrity obsession can lead to dangerous behavior such as stalking. Some notable stalkers include John Hinckley, Dawnette Knight and Ambrose Kappos.

Obsessed individuals may also place more importance in the activities of celebrities over the activities happening in their own lives.

See also: Hollywood values

References