Difference between revisions of "Pundit"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: right '''Pundit''' is an expert or opinion-leader who analyzes events in his or her area of expertise. In India is a priest or learned man. == See also == ...)
 
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Image:Fox O Reilly.jpg|right]]
+
[[Image:Fox O Reilly.jpg|250px|right]]
−
'''Pundit''' is an expert or opinion-leader who analyzes events in his or her area of expertise. In [[India]] is a priest or learned man.  
+
'''Pundit''' is an expert or opinion-leader who analyzes events in his or her area of expertise.  
  
−
== See also ==
+
==Etymology from India==
 +
The [[etymology]] of the word pundit comes the original ancient [[Sanskrit]] word "Paṇḍita" used in [[India]] at least since 200 B.C. to refer to a very learned man or [[scholar]] in the realm of [[Indian philosophy]]. An example is Sakya Pandita of [[Tibet]].
  
−
*[[Michelle Malkin]]
+
== Books ==
−
*[[Fox News Channel]]
 
  
 +
*''Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?'' by Philip E. Tetlock, Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (August 20, 2006).
  
−
 
+
[[Category:Journalists]]
−
[[category:Journalists]]
+
[[Category:Buddhism]]
 +
[[Category:Indian Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 08:18, October 20, 2023

Fox O Reilly.jpg

Pundit is an expert or opinion-leader who analyzes events in his or her area of expertise.

Etymology from India

The etymology of the word pundit comes the original ancient Sanskrit word "Paṇḍita" used in India at least since 200 B.C. to refer to a very learned man or scholar in the realm of Indian philosophy. An example is Sakya Pandita of Tibet.

Books

  • Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? by Philip E. Tetlock, Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (August 20, 2006).