Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moctezuma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UnTerrorist (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Wow, I've found lots of links supporting both sides, but I guess you're probably right. --[[User:UnTerrorist|UnTerrorist]] 09:19, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | :Wow, I've found lots of links supporting both sides, but I guess you're probably right. --[[User:UnTerrorist|UnTerrorist]] 09:19, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::I may not be right; what I have written above is mere opinion, and the more so with your statement above. Perhaps the article could be expanded and improved with such info. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:25, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::How about something like '1480 or 1466'? (Except maybe in a bit more detail?) --[[User:UnTerrorist|UnTerrorist]] 09:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::I do wish we had something more accurate, but there's just lots of cases in history in which we don't know the exact dates of birth/death. But put 1466 before 1480! :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:07, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, September 13, 2007
Year of birth is generally agreed by most historians to have been 1480; Moctezuma's father died one year later. Karajou 09:15, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- Wow, I've found lots of links supporting both sides, but I guess you're probably right. --UnTerrorist 09:19, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- I may not be right; what I have written above is mere opinion, and the more so with your statement above. Perhaps the article could be expanded and improved with such info. Karajou 09:25, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- How about something like '1480 or 1466'? (Except maybe in a bit more detail?) --UnTerrorist 09:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- I do wish we had something more accurate, but there's just lots of cases in history in which we don't know the exact dates of birth/death. But put 1466 before 1480! :) Karajou 13:07, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- How about something like '1480 or 1466'? (Except maybe in a bit more detail?) --UnTerrorist 09:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)