Difference between revisions of "Roberts Court"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add members of Roberts Court)
(The Roberts Court is perhaps the least productive ever, based on statistical measures of achievement.)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The "Roberts Court" refers to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] during the tenure of [[John Roberts]] as its Chief Justice. The members are as follows:
+
The '''Roberts Court''' refers to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] during the tenure of [[John Roberts]] as its Chief Justice (2005-). It is the successor to the [[Rehnquist Court]].  
  
−
*Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] (since October 2005)
+
The Roberts Court is perhaps the least productive ever, based on statistical measures of achievement.<ref>https://empiricalscotus.com/2022/06/07/least-productive-court/</ref>  The current members are as follows:
−
*Justice [[John Paul Stevens]]
+
 
−
*Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]
+
* Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] (since October 2005)
−
*Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]]
+
* Associate Justice [[Elena Kagan]] (since 2010)
−
*Justice [[David Souter]]
+
* Associate Justice [[Neil Gorsuch]] (since 2017)
−
*Justice [[Clarence Thomas]]
+
* Associate Justice [[Brett Kavanaugh]] (since 2018)
−
*Justice [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]
+
* Associate Justice [[Sonia Sotomayor]] (since August 2009)
−
*Justice [[Stephen Breyer]]
+
* Associate Justice [[Clarence Thomas]]
−
*Justice [[Samuel Alito]] (since January 2006)
+
* Associate Justice [[Amy Coney Barrett]] (since November 2020)
 +
* Associate Justice [[Stephen Breyer]]
 +
* Associate Justice [[Samuel Alito]] (since January 2006)
  
 
The Roberts Court expressly overturned these precedents as of July 2007:
 
The Roberts Court expressly overturned these precedents as of July 2007:
Line 15: Line 17:
 
*''Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc.'', 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007) overturned the antitrust per se rule against [[Resale Price Maintenance]] established by ''Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co'', 220 U.S. 373 (1911)
 
*''Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc.'', 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007) overturned the antitrust per se rule against [[Resale Price Maintenance]] established by ''Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co'', 220 U.S. 373 (1911)
  
−
*''Bowles v. Russell'', 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007), overturned a procedural rule about the timing of a filing that was established in ''Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.'', 371 U.S. 215 (1962), and ''Thompson v. INS'', 375 U.S. 384 (1964)
+
*''[[Bowles v. Russell]]'', 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007), overturned a procedural rule about the timing of a filing that was established in ''Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.'', 371 U.S. 215 (1962), and ''Thompson v. INS'', 375 U.S. 384 (1964)
  
 
*''Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc.'', 547 U.S. 28 (2006), overturned by an 8-0 vote an antitrust precedent established in ''International Salt Co. v. United States'', 332 U.S. 392 (1947).
 
*''Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc.'', 547 U.S. 28 (2006), overturned by an 8-0 vote an antitrust precedent established in ''International Salt Co. v. United States'', 332 U.S. 392 (1947).
  
−
In addition, [[liberals]] feel that the Roberts Court implicitly overturned precedents in these cases, making a total of eight precedents overturned by the Roberts/Alito Court in merely a year and a half:<ref>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/5099.html</ref>
+
In addition, [[liberals]] feel that the Roberts Court implicitly overturned precedents in these cases, making a total of eight precedents overturned by the Roberts/Alito Court in merely a year and a half:<ref>https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/5099.html</ref>
  
 
*''Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1'', 127 S. Ct. 2738 (2007) (ending school desegregation programs in the absence of an applicable court order)
 
*''Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1'', 127 S. Ct. 2738 (2007) (ending school desegregation programs in the absence of an applicable court order)
Line 42: Line 44:
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
−
 
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[Category: United States legal system]]
+
[[Category:United States Law]]
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court]]
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Latest revision as of 01:09, June 8, 2022

The Roberts Court refers to the U.S. Supreme Court during the tenure of John Roberts as its Chief Justice (2005-). It is the successor to the Rehnquist Court.

The Roberts Court is perhaps the least productive ever, based on statistical measures of achievement.[1] The current members are as follows:

The Roberts Court expressly overturned these precedents as of July 2007:

  • Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007) overturned the antitrust per se rule against Resale Price Maintenance established by Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co, 220 U.S. 373 (1911)
  • Bowles v. Russell, 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007), overturned a procedural rule about the timing of a filing that was established in Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U.S. 215 (1962), and Thompson v. INS, 375 U.S. 384 (1964)
  • Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), overturned by an 8-0 vote an antitrust precedent established in International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947).

In addition, liberals feel that the Roberts Court implicitly overturned precedents in these cases, making a total of eight precedents overturned by the Roberts/Alito Court in merely a year and a half:[2]

  • Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 127 S. Ct. 2738 (2007) (ending school desegregation programs in the absence of an applicable court order)
  • Gonzales v. Carhart, 127 S. Ct. 1610 (2007) (ending partial-birth abortion by upholding the federal statute)
  • Hein v. Freedom from Religion Found., Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007) (upholding faith-based programs by limiting jurisdiction to challenge spending by the Executive Branch under the Establishment Clause)
  • Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 127 S. Ct. 2162 (2007) (cutting off employment sex discrimination claims)
  • FEC v. Wis. Right to Life, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2652 (2007) (end restrictions on independent campaign expenditures prior to an election by striking down portions of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill)

Future cases

The Roberts Court appears to have a 5-vote majority to overrule liberal precedents in these areas:

References