Difference between revisions of "Pike v. Bruce Church"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.'', 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970), the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a test for state or local taxes "directed to legitimate local concerns, with effects upon in...) |
m (Reverted edits by WOW (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.'', 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] adopted a test for state or local taxes "directed to legitimate local concerns, with effects upon interstate commerce that are only incidental."<ref>Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. at 624.</ref> | + | In '''''Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.''''', 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] adopted a test for state or local taxes "directed to legitimate local concerns, with effects upon interstate commerce that are only incidental."<ref>Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. at 624.</ref> |
Under the ''Pike'' test, the Court will uphold a nondiscriminatory statute "unless the burden imposed on [interstate] commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits."<ref>''Pike'', 397 U.S. at 142; Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan., 489 U.S. 493, 525-526 (1989).</ref> | Under the ''Pike'' test, the Court will uphold a nondiscriminatory statute "unless the burden imposed on [interstate] commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits."<ref>''Pike'', 397 U.S. at 142; Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan., 489 U.S. 493, 525-526 (1989).</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| − | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | |
| − | [[ | ||
Latest revision as of 16:38, July 11, 2021
In Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970), the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a test for state or local taxes "directed to legitimate local concerns, with effects upon interstate commerce that are only incidental."[1]
Under the Pike test, the Court will uphold a nondiscriminatory statute "unless the burden imposed on [interstate] commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits."[2]