Difference between revisions of "Warth v. Seldin"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In ''Warth v. Seldin'', 422 U.S. 490, 500 (1975), the U.S. Supreme Court held that standing "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct i...)
 
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In ''Warth v. Seldin'', 422 U.S. 490, 500 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[standing]] "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal."
+
In '''''Warth v. Seldin''''', 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that "[t]he plaintiff generally must assert his own legal rights and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties."
−
[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]
+
 
 +
The Court also held that [[standing]] "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal." ''Id.'' at 500.
 +
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Latest revision as of 21:34, July 13, 2016

In Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "[t]he plaintiff generally must assert his own legal rights and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties."

The Court also held that standing "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal." Id. at 500.