Difference between revisions of "User talk:Realitycheck"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(lifting block)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I am going to lift your block for obscenity, but will be required to reinstate it if you post any more inappropriate material.  Please read our [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments|rules]]:  this is a clean site.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:59, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I am going to lift your block for obscenity, but will be required to reinstate it if you post any more inappropriate material.  Please read our [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments|rules]]:  this is a clean site.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:59, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I have replied on your user page.  I consider your block to be offensive, as there was as far as I could tell nothing at all wrong with my article additions. --[[User:Realitycheck|Realitycheck]] 01:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Using British/Australian spellings==
 +
 +
Your changing of the American "standardized" spelling to the British/Australian "standardised" is explicitly forbidden under the Conservapedia Commandments, and will result in a block if you continue to make that edit.  --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 04:22, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Oh sorry, my ignorance... wait a second. Or is it really?

Latest revision as of 08:28, March 14, 2007

I am going to lift your block for obscenity, but will be required to reinstate it if you post any more inappropriate material. Please read our rules: this is a clean site. Thank you.--Aschlafly 12:59, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I have replied on your user page. I consider your block to be offensive, as there was as far as I could tell nothing at all wrong with my article additions. --Realitycheck 01:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

Using British/Australian spellings

Your changing of the American "standardized" spelling to the British/Australian "standardised" is explicitly forbidden under the Conservapedia Commandments, and will result in a block if you continue to make that edit. --NVConservative 04:22, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Oh sorry, my ignorance... wait a second. Or is it really?