Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prisoner's dilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RobSmith (Talk); changed back to last version by SpeakerOfTheDead) |
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 12:34, October 6, 2007
Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente
How did you determine the values in the table? --Spyder 14:08, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --Spyder 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Ooops! Thanks buddy.-Speaker 14:23, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Censoring?
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)