Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prisoner's dilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente == How did you determine the values in the table? --~~~~) |
m (Reverted edits by RobSmith (Talk); changed back to last version by SpeakerOfTheDead) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente == | == Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente == | ||
How did you determine the values in the table? --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:08, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | How did you determine the values in the table? --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:08, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Ooops! Thanks buddy.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:23, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Censoring? == | ||
| + | Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:34, October 6, 2007
Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente
How did you determine the values in the table? --Spyder 14:08, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --Spyder 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Ooops! Thanks buddy.-Speaker 14:23, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Censoring?
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)