|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | ==Search Engines== | | ==Search Engines== |
| − | [[AltaVista]] was a popular early search engine in 1995, but its slow speed caused it to lose out to [[Google]], which would retrieve information almost instantaneously based on presorted techniques. In the December 2008 Nielsen Online rankings, Google had over 62% of the search traffic on the Internet, and [[Yahoo!]] is a distant second. Google, Yahoo and AOL all showed good year-on-year growth, with [[Microsoft]]'s MSN/Live Search being the biggest loser.<ref>http://searchenginewatch.com/3632382</ref> Other new search engines have been developed as well, such as Microsoft's [[Bing]] (the alternative to MSN/Live Search), and another [[web site]] called [[Duck Duck Go]]. Each search engines aims to compete against the more commonly used information retrieval sites, and in doing so, they each typically have their own unique driver or capability that others do not offer. | + | [[AltaVista]] was a popular early search engine in 1995, but its slow speed caused it to lose out to [[Google]], which would retrieve information almost instantaneously based on presorted techniques. In the December 2008 Nielsen Online rankings, Google had over 62% of the search traffic on the Internet, and [[Yahoo!]] is a distant second. Google, Yahoo and AOL all showed good year-on-year growth, with [[Microsoft]]'s MSN/Live Search being the biggest loser.<ref>http://searchenginewatch.com/3632382</ref> Other new search engines have been developed as well, such as Microsoft's [[Bing]] (the alternative to MSN/Live Search), and another [[Web site]] called [[DuckDuckGo]]. Each search engines aims to compete against the more commonly used information retrieval sites, and in doing so, they each typically have their own unique driver or capability that others do not offer. |
| − | | |
| − | ==Quotes on Police State Search Engine Surveillance==
| |
| − | * "The progress of [[science]] in furnishing the [[big government|government]] with means of [[espionage]] is not likely to stop with wire tapping. Ways may some day be developed by which the [[Police state|government]], without removing papers from secret drawers, can reproduce them in court, and by which it will be enabled to expose to a [[jury]] the most intimate occurrences of the home. Advances in the psychic and related sciences may bring means of exploring unexpressed beliefs, thoughts and emotions. 'That places the [[liberty]] of every man in the hands of every [[tyrant|petty officer]]' was said by James Otis of much lesser intrusions than these. 1 To Lord Camden a far slighter intrusion seemed '[[subversive]] of all the comforts of society.' Can it be that the [[Constitution]] affords no protection against such invasions of [[Fourth Amendment|individual security]]?"
| |
| − | ** [[Louis Brandeis]]''' (1856-1941), [[United States Supreme Court]] [[Associate Justice]] Dissenting, ''[[Olmstead v. United States]]'', 277 U.S. 438 (1928).
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==See Also==
| |
| − | * [[Duck Duck Go]] - [[Privacy]]-oriented Search Engine
| |
| − | * [[Google]], [[Yahoo]] and [[Bing]]
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | * [[Censorship]]
| |
| − | * [[Tools of censorship]]
| |
| − | * [[Censorability]]
| |
| − | * [[Fairness Doctrine]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal censorship]]
| |
| − | * [[Evolutionist censorship]]
| |
| − | * [[Media censorship]]
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | * The Perpetual [[War on Drugs]], [[War on Terror]] and the [[Police state]]
| |
| − | * [[Wikileaks]] and [[Julian Assange]] - [[Australia]]n [[leftist]] [[hacker]]
| |
| − | * [[Bradley Manning]] - [[Homosexual]] [[Hacker]] [[Traitor]] of [[State secret]]s
| |
| − | * [[Social media]]: Facebook, Twitter, [[Google Plus]], Youtube, [[Yahoo]]
| |
| − | * [[NSA]] and other [[Intelligence agency]] [[mass surveillance]]: [[PRISM]], [[Wiretap]] - [[Roving wiretap]]
| |
| − | * [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act]] of the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]
| |
| − | * [[Police]], [[RICO]] and [[Asset forfeiture]]
| |
| − | * [[Mililtarization of police]]: [[SWAT]] and [[No-knock raid]]s
| |
| − | * [[Drug trafficking]] of the [[Drug cartel]]s, [[Gangs]], [[Drug dealer]]s, [[Hollywood values]] - [[Fashion industry values]] - [[Public school values]] - [[Professor values]]
| |
| − | * [[Big government]] [[ObamaCare]]-[[Common Core]]-[[Social Security]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[Nanny state]], leads to [[Police state]]: [[Globalist]]-[[Statist]]-[[Socialist]]-[[National Socialist]]-[[Communist]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal totalitarianism]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | '''Contrast with:'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[Tails (operating system)]] ([[Linux]]-based) and [[Tor (anonymity network)]]-[[I2P]] [[Firefox]] [[browser]] [[HTTPS Everywhere]] [[encryption]] for [[Internet]] [[anonymity]] to protect [[unalienable rights|unalienable]] [[Fifth Amendment]] - [[Fourth Amendment]] [[Right to Privacy]] ([[Internet privacy]]) and [[Second Amendment]] - [[First Amendment]] rights against [[unconstitutional]] [[Gun control]] - [[Internet censorship]] [[Big government]] [[Police state]], [[hackers]], and "[[5 U.S.C. § 3331|all enemies, foreign and domestic]]" of [[American values|American]] [[liberty]].
| |
| − | * [[Encryption]]: [[Cryptography]]-[[Cryptanalysis]]-[[Cryptology]]-[[Data encryption]]-[[Public-key encryption]]-[[Steganography]]
| |
| − | * [[Conservative values]] and [[Libertarian]] [[American values]] - [[Small town values]] of [[Limited government]] and [[liberty]]
| |
| − | * [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]
| |
| − | * [[Prism-break.org]] - Opt out of global data [[surveillance]] programs like [[PRISM]], [[XKeyscore]] and [[Tempora]].<ref>"Help make [[mass surveillance]] of entire populations uneconomical! We all have an [[unalienable right]] to [[privacy]], which you can exercise today by [[encrypting]] your communications and ending your reliance on proprietary products and services."</ref>
| |
| − | * [[Open source]] [[Free software]] not [[Microsoft]]-[[Apple]]-[[Google]]-[[Android]]
| |
| − | * [[Duck Duck Go]] [[search engine]] instead of [[Google]], [[Yahoo]] and [[Bing]]
| |
| − | * [[Hologram of Liberty - The Constitution's Shocking Alliance With Big Government]] by [[Boston T. Party]] - [[Kenneth W. Royce]]
| |
| − | * [[One Nation, Under Surveillance - Privacy From the Watchful Eye]] by [[Boston T. Party]]
| |
| − | * [[Electronic Communications Privacy Act]] of 1986
| |
| − | * [[Privacy Act of 1974]]
| |
| − | * [[Edward J. Snowden]] revelations of [[unconstitutional]] domestic spying on law-abiding [[American]] [[citizen]]s
| |
| | | | |
| | + | ==Technical requirements== |
| | + | It is estimated that at least a million lines of code is needed for a working search engine. Two open source search engines are Elasticsearch and Solr.<ref>https://www.searchtechnologies.com/blog/solr-vs-elasticsearch-top-open-source-search</ref> Search engines for the public internet also require an enormous amount of information on crawled Web sites, and "spiders" which continuously crawl the Web to update this information are also required. This means that significant computing and data storage resources are needed. |
| | | | |
| | ==References== | | ==References== |
| Line 54: |
Line 11: |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Technology]] | | [[Category:Technology]] |
| − | [[Category:Search Engines]] | + | [[Category:Search Engines]] |
| − | [[Category:Internet]]
| |
A search engine retrieves information on the Internet for users. Typically a user types in key words and the search engine will display a list of links containing those terms. The search engine may list links based on algorithms designed to give priority to relevancy, or popularity, or fees paid by sites to the search engine company. Generally the methods used by search engines are proprietary and not completely known.
Search Engines
AltaVista was a popular early search engine in 1995, but its slow speed caused it to lose out to Google, which would retrieve information almost instantaneously based on presorted techniques. In the December 2008 Nielsen Online rankings, Google had over 62% of the search traffic on the Internet, and Yahoo! is a distant second. Google, Yahoo and AOL all showed good year-on-year growth, with Microsoft's MSN/Live Search being the biggest loser.[1] Other new search engines have been developed as well, such as Microsoft's Bing (the alternative to MSN/Live Search), and another Web site called DuckDuckGo. Each search engines aims to compete against the more commonly used information retrieval sites, and in doing so, they each typically have their own unique driver or capability that others do not offer.
Technical requirements
It is estimated that at least a million lines of code is needed for a working search engine. Two open source search engines are Elasticsearch and Solr.[2] Search engines for the public internet also require an enormous amount of information on crawled Web sites, and "spiders" which continuously crawl the Web to update this information are also required. This means that significant computing and data storage resources are needed.
References