Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marxism"
From Conservapedia
(→Really?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT) | :Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 02:02, November 17, 2012
Not Appropriate
I think this article doesn't show how evil marxism is and gives the impression that it is a good thing, can someone please write about how marxism has hurt the world? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jesusbushcheney (talk)
Marxism, as a political view point, is not evil. However those who warp it, such as Stalin, are.
ComradeK 22:19, 17 April 2009 (EDT)
Add Theory?
Would anyone mind if I put any actual marxist theory in this article? Its all about Soviet history, with a very very brief glimpse of anything remotely relating to Marxism itself LuxemburgFTW 18:22 April Your mother 2999
