Difference between revisions of "Scientific results"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cat) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [http://www.av8n.com/physics/authority.htm] | + | '''Scientific results''' in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [http://www.av8n.com/physics/authority.htm] |
| − | [[ | + | See: [[Replication of results]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Science]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, June 24, 2016
Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [1]