Difference between revisions of "User talk:SeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Two words: Hotspot Shield. A free IP proxy that I recommend ALL Conservapedians use to protect their IP addresses from the spite of rogue sysops like Karajou. BTW, it's STILL not your user page!)
(→‎Wasting our time: new section)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Hi there.
+
<br>
 +
<center><b align="center" style="width: 70%; background:#000;color:#eee;border: 4px gold solid; font-size: 50px;">RETIRED</b><br><br><br></center>
  
−
[[User talk: SeanS/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
+
== Relly retired ==
  
 +
Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
 +
:I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
  
−
=Machismo Article=
+
== Kenneth Williams ==
−
I am sorry about that but you should have a look at this article then: [[pride]]. --[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:34, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
:I know what it is and I know what the Sins are, but they aren't biblical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
::Ok. Are you saying that I should have named the category Machismo and Christianity instead ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:38, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
:::No, its fine. I was removing the 7 deadly sins thing simply because those arent biblical, they are sins, but not "seven deadly"--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:40, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
::::I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
:::::The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
−
::::::Alright, thanks for the update.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 23:00, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
  
−
== User:Conservative ==
+
Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --[[User:Hetgar|Hetgar]] 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
  
−
Hi, this is John Mairs, also (briefly) known as CliveCornwell. I know that I'm now a sockpuppet and I know that you'll have to delete me; that's your duty as an admin and I hold no grudges against you for it. However I'm sure you realise yourself how much damage Ken DeMyer AKA User:Conservative is doing to Conservapedia's reputation. In the last week at least two other editors as well as myself have decided to leave because of his actions and several more are extremely unhappy with him. Something has to be done about him, because all he's doing is giving atheists an excuse to laugh and point fingers. From now on I'll be editing at A Storehouse of Knowledge, which is what a Christian wiki SHOULD be. I wish you all the best with getting Conservapedia back on track and heading in that direction. Godspeed. John. --[[User:CJBernard|CJBernard]] 17:49, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
+
== Block of Danielarmunrud ==
 +
 
 +
Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or [http://www.ameriwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Ameriwiki]; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote ''Lieberull Valyoos.'' --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::I could ban you for that... but eh. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Wasting our time ==
 +
 
 +
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Wasting our time ==
 +
 
 +
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:52, November 29, 2011


RETIRED


Relly retired

Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--James Wilson 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--SeanS 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

Kenneth Williams

Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --Hetgar 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)

Block of Danielarmunrud

Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or Ameriwiki; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote Lieberull Valyoos. --SamTC 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --SeanS 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --SamTC 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
I could ban you for that... but eh. --SeanS 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --SamTC 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Now that is just stalking :P--SeanS 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)