Difference between revisions of "User talk:SeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by SamTC (talk) to last revision by SeanS)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
−
::::::No, it's advertising! Let's face it: AW could actually turn into a proper conservative wiki, and achieve what this hole was meant to. It just needs editors. Instead of blocking people, why not steer them there? Conservapedia is in its death spiral. Nobody counts here any more except Schlafly, Ken, Karajou and Jpatt, and a bit of tolerance for weird, fat old Uncle Ed with his paedosmile. This place is screwed and it deserves it. AW deserves a chance. And by the way, we need an astronomy article and you're interested in it, so why not give it a try? --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:59, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
−
:::::::And have you looked at the farce that's the World History course? Schlafly just gave 60/60 to some fool who called the Holy Roman Empire a nation state. Sometimes I just want to smash my face into my keyboard. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 22:03, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 

Revision as of 04:18, November 10, 2011


RETIRED


Relly retired

Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--James Wilson 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--SeanS 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

Kenneth Williams

Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --Hetgar 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)

Block of Danielarmunrud

Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or Ameriwiki; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote Lieberull Valyoos. --SamTC 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --SeanS 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --SamTC 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
I could ban you for that... but eh. --SeanS 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --SamTC 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Now that is just stalking :P--SeanS 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SeanS&oldid=935431"