Difference between revisions of "User talk:BrentH"
m (→PETA and stuff) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
It's not that i don't think they are liberal, or that they want to redefine the word, the problem is the size of PETA and supporters is insignificant in the literal world, making the "redefinition" of a person a pipe dream at best--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:24, 17 September 2011 (EDT) | It's not that i don't think they are liberal, or that they want to redefine the word, the problem is the size of PETA and supporters is insignificant in the literal world, making the "redefinition" of a person a pipe dream at best--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:24, 17 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::The overwhelming majority of Americans are pro-life and believe in the Biblical account of creation instead of evolution, and yet a "insignificant" number of liberals "in the literal world" have worked to marginalize those points of view. The numerical size of a movement is irrelevant. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 10:40, 17 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:40, September 17, 2011
Welcome!
Hello, BrentH, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, BrentH!
DMorris 20:43, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
warning
I am watching your edits on the mainpage talk and I note your sarcasm. Please desist. MaxFletcher 21:43, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
PETA and stuff
It's not that i don't think they are liberal, or that they want to redefine the word, the problem is the size of PETA and supporters is insignificant in the literal world, making the "redefinition" of a person a pipe dream at best--SeanS 10:24, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
- The overwhelming majority of Americans are pro-life and believe in the Biblical account of creation instead of evolution, and yet a "insignificant" number of liberals "in the literal world" have worked to marginalize those points of view. The numerical size of a movement is irrelevant. BrentH 10:40, 17 September 2011 (EDT)