Difference between revisions of "User talk:HP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::Name calling counts as uncivility. As I stated earlier, discuss the topic on hand or don't say anything at all. Consider this a warning - next time, you just might be blocked for incivility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:49, 3 August 2011 (EDT) | :::Name calling counts as uncivility. As I stated earlier, discuss the topic on hand or don't say anything at all. Consider this a warning - next time, you just might be blocked for incivility. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:49, 3 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::I did discuss the topic at hand, and my position's on the record. If you want to be part of Rob's dramafest which is undermining this site, I can't stop you. But you just called me a racist. Pot calling the kettle black there? [[User:HP|HP]] 23:53, 3 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:53, August 4, 2011
Please feel free to leave comments here. HP 23:59, 20 June 2011 (EDT)
reply: obama
supporting some of the things he does or believes/says he believes is not the same as supporting obama. --SeanS 22:29, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
unlawful acts
That is an incorrect statement-- removed. --Jpatt 21:50, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- How so? For Obama's entire term, Obama's minions have been playing the race card, claiming everything as racism. If he gets impeached over essentially financial fraud with issuing illegal debt, the NAACP and the DNC are going to howl racism, even if Tim Scott and Alan West are front and center charging Obama. So your statement that this statement is incorrect is a bit presumptuous. Maybe it could be worded or sourced better, but it is correct and we should not have to be PC here. I can go to Wikipedia for that! HP 22:28, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- I agree with a valid accusation but if you look at the record over the past three months [1] clearly it is white liberals that use the Race Card the most. BHO is feverishly in campaign mode. Nothing, no court order, no impeachment hearing, nothing will prevent him from running in 2012. --Jpatt 22:39, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Do you not believe that white liberals are being directed someway somehow by the White House? BHO may be in campaign mode, but he'll lose in a landslide come 2012! HP 22:51, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
Taking this from the Cyrus talk page
Yes that is the fate of liberal Christians, but Tortured by Satan? I think you should do some reading up of your own about what the bible says my friend, Satan does no torture in hell.--SeanS 15:55, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
An underused tool in today's society
- OK ..... kind of a red herring there, but may you please sign your posts next time? HP 23:27, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- Sure - how's this. You're very quick to label someone as "liberal" because they questioned your edit. Try staying on topic and discussing the idea on the table rather than insulting the other editor. I personally thought your comment had racial undertones. --SharonW 23:32, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- No, I labeled him a liberal because he slanders Conservapedia and its admin corpson sites dedicated to criticizing Conservapedia. How pathetic is it to have to create a site (which is like #2 on Google when searching Conservapedia) to criticize Conservapedia? What that means is we're getting our message out and that pisses them off, apparently including Rob. And Rob is intellectually dishonest as he piggybacked off of my contributions, making them part of a featured article. HP 23:43, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- Racial undertones? Seriously? HP 23:44, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- Name calling counts as uncivility. As I stated earlier, discuss the topic on hand or don't say anything at all. Consider this a warning - next time, you just might be blocked for incivility. --SharonW 23:49, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- I did discuss the topic at hand, and my position's on the record. If you want to be part of Rob's dramafest which is undermining this site, I can't stop you. But you just called me a racist. Pot calling the kettle black there? HP 23:53, 3 August 2011 (EDT)