Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bureaucracy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
("Things")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I don't know about anyone else, but when I see the words "things" in any scholarly context, it sends up a big red flag.  I'd like to change it, but I don't honestly know what "things" the bureaucracies are trying to decide.  Does anyone have a better word to put here?
 
I don't know about anyone else, but when I see the words "things" in any scholarly context, it sends up a big red flag.  I'd like to change it, but I don't honestly know what "things" the bureaucracies are trying to decide.  Does anyone have a better word to put here?
 +
 +
Same here. I'll change it to something like "matters of importance. --[[User:ThatCentristGuy|ThatCentristGuy]] 17:42, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Stub ==
 +
 +
Who else here thinks that this article is a stub? --[[User:ThatCentristGuy|ThatCentristGuy]] 17:42, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:42, July 28, 2011

"Things"

I don't know about anyone else, but when I see the words "things" in any scholarly context, it sends up a big red flag. I'd like to change it, but I don't honestly know what "things" the bureaucracies are trying to decide. Does anyone have a better word to put here?

Same here. I'll change it to something like "matters of importance. --ThatCentristGuy 17:42, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Stub

Who else here thinks that this article is a stub? --ThatCentristGuy 17:42, 28 July 2011 (EDT)