Difference between revisions of "Talk:Counterexamples to Global Warming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(restore) |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
I hope this helps. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:33, 1 July 2011 (EDT) | I hope this helps. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:33, 1 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Why can't you just put that in the global warming article. It seems needlessly redundant to create a whole bunch of articles, it won't do anything but create a mess. [[User:GTac|GTac]] 11:07, 12 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:07, July 12, 2011
Better focus of efforts on global warming issue
Conservapedia's global warming article needs a revamp so I think time would be better spent improving Conservapedia's global warming article. I suggest the same with the Medieval Warm Period article.
I also suggest the below articles be created as I think people would be more interested in them. I think this would be a much better use of time in terms of informing the public on the global warming issue.
- Global warming causes (from time to time the world does increase in temperature)
I hope this helps. conservative 17:33, 1 July 2011 (EDT)
- Why can't you just put that in the global warming article. It seems needlessly redundant to create a whole bunch of articles, it won't do anything but create a mess. GTac 11:07, 12 July 2011 (EDT)