Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(what happens ... ?) |
(→Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion: example) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''we do not block for ideological reasons'' ... ''but for silliness'' what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness? | ''we do not block for ideological reasons'' ... ''but for silliness'' what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness? | ||
[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Wouldn't "''...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it''" in the article [[Fornication]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fornication&oldid=86794] be considered ''[[silliness]]'' or is that ''[[ideology]]''? | ||
| + | :[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:58, April 5, 2007
Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion
we do not block for ideological reasons ... but for silliness what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness? WhatIsG0ing0n 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Wouldn't "...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it" in the article Fornication [1] be considered silliness or is that ideology?
- WhatIsG0ing0n 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT)