Difference between revisions of "Talk:Karen Armstrong"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(critque)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I am  amazing to find this only-positive review of the anti-Christ writer Karen Armstrong. That is all that you see in WP, which reads like a infomercial for here, but here? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Armstrong#Views for what i mean. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 06:11, 18 February 2011 (EST)
+
I am  amazing to find this only-positive review of the anti-Christ writer Karen Armstrong. Who was responsible for this? That is all that you see in WP, which reads like a infomercial for here, but here? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Armstrong#Views for what i mean. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 06:11, 18 February 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
It may be more of an essay now (needs proofing), but it tells a more balanced story. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 19:45, 21 February 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:45, February 22, 2011

I am amazing to find this only-positive review of the anti-Christ writer Karen Armstrong. Who was responsible for this? That is all that you see in WP, which reads like a infomercial for here, but here? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Armstrong#Views for what i mean. Daniel1212 06:11, 18 February 2011 (EST)

It may be more of an essay now (needs proofing), but it tells a more balanced story. Daniel1212 19:45, 21 February 2011 (EST)