Difference between revisions of "Credibility"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New article 2011, a start.)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
{{cquote|The merits of each evaluation role will be discussed as to its relationship with credibility, objectivity, independence and usefulness.}} [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED106367&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED106367]
 
{{cquote|The merits of each evaluation role will be discussed as to its relationship with credibility, objectivity, independence and usefulness.}} [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED106367&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED106367]
  
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Liberal bias]]
 +
*[[Devotion]]
 +
*[[Encourage]]
  
 
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 
[[Category:Dictionary]]

Revision as of 20:02, January 14, 2011

Credibility is the quality or power of inspiring belief or trustworthy.

Build your credibility before persuading.

American credibility in the war on terrorism depends on a strong stand against all terrorist acts, whether committed by foe or friend. Arlen Specter.

Objectivity and Credibility

Credibility-enhancing actions include: Showing you care about the other person and have their best interests at heart. [1]

Language that reduces credibility includes: Totally and absolutely excessive exaggeration. Ibidem

Be objective and specific and support what you say with evidence, such as facts, statistics or testimonials. Be even-handed; If you are presenting possibilities, give all options a fair hearing and don’t leave out important information. If your reader finds out you’ve omitted key facts, you’ll lose credibility.[2]


“ The merits of each evaluation role will be discussed as to its relationship with credibility, objectivity, independence and usefulness. ”

[3]

See also