Difference between revisions of "Talk:James Maxwell"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Evolution comments by a physist?)
 
(reply to Mtur)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
What does the beliefs of a person who studied physics and atomic structure have to do with biology?  These are about as distinct disciplines as computer science and law... and I know that my background in CS doesn't give me any insight into the goings on of the courts. Maybe if he was a biologist it would be noteworthy, but what authority does he have to state opinion that should be respected on biology? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:32, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 
What does the beliefs of a person who studied physics and atomic structure have to do with biology?  These are about as distinct disciplines as computer science and law... and I know that my background in CS doesn't give me any insight into the goings on of the courts. Maybe if he was a biologist it would be noteworthy, but what authority does he have to state opinion that should be respected on biology? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:32, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Well, if that's your approach, then what authority did Darwin have to comment on evolution either???
 +
 +
: Comments by anthropologists are self-serving.  We also want to know what bright people have to say from their independent vantage points.
 +
 +
: More generally, and this hardly seems necessary to repeat, don't delete facts from this website for liberal reasons not in our [[rules]].  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:36, April 3, 2007

Evolution comments by a physist?

What does the beliefs of a person who studied physics and atomic structure have to do with biology? These are about as distinct disciplines as computer science and law... and I know that my background in CS doesn't give me any insight into the goings on of the courts. Maybe if he was a biologist it would be noteworthy, but what authority does he have to state opinion that should be respected on biology? --Mtur 19:32, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Well, if that's your approach, then what authority did Darwin have to comment on evolution either???
Comments by anthropologists are self-serving. We also want to know what bright people have to say from their independent vantage points.
More generally, and this hardly seems necessary to repeat, don't delete facts from this website for liberal reasons not in our rules. Thanks.--Aschlafly 19:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT)