Difference between revisions of "Talk:Net neutrality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Specifically liberal/Democratic issue?: new section) |
(→Specifically liberal/Democratic issue?: wasn't clear enough) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Specifically liberal/Democratic issue? == | == Specifically liberal/Democratic issue? == | ||
| − | The most recent edit by Andy claims that this is an issue specific to liberal causes. | + | The most recent edit by Andy claims that this is an issue specific to liberal causes. This isn't always true - for example, (usually and historically) libertarian groups like the EFF claim to support the "idea" but argue that the track record of government involvement in technology has always been very pro-Hollywood and pro-business. See here: [http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/08/google-verizon-netneutrality EFF Net Neutrality]. -[[User:Danq|danq]] 16:57, 29 August 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:55, October 11, 2010
I'm pretty sure the correct term is net neutrality. Somewhat short for internet neutrality. ColinRtalk 02:36, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Feel free to do whatever you want with it. I'm sure you know more about the topic than I do. DanH 02:38, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Specifically liberal/Democratic issue?
The most recent edit by Andy claims that this is an issue specific to liberal causes. This isn't always true - for example, (usually and historically) libertarian groups like the EFF claim to support the "idea" but argue that the track record of government involvement in technology has always been very pro-Hollywood and pro-business. See here: EFF Net Neutrality. -danq 16:57, 29 August 2010 (EDT)