Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pepsi-Cola"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(omission of "under God") |
(not sure ...) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Pledge of Allegence: omission of "under God"== | ==Pledge of Allegence: omission of "under God"== | ||
I don't no if it's true or not (yet), but I'm seeing postings all over [[Facebook]] about Pepsi's apparent ommission of "under God" in the Pledge on some kind of special can style. If this is true, it's probably worth a mention in the article. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 21:02, 4 June 2010 (EDT) | I don't no if it's true or not (yet), but I'm seeing postings all over [[Facebook]] about Pepsi's apparent ommission of "under God" in the Pledge on some kind of special can style. If this is true, it's probably worth a mention in the article. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 21:02, 4 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :A quick Google search seems to debunk this [http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/undergod.asp (Snopes report)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 21:16, 4 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Thanks. Got to love internet rumors like that. Isn't that considered libel? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 22:03, 4 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::I'm absolutely no lawyer - but it's very hard to find the source of a rumor like that, and I '''believe''' that it would have to be proven that said source knowingly and maliciously posted false information.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:08, 4 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:08, June 5, 2010
Pledge of Allegence: omission of "under God"
I don't no if it's true or not (yet), but I'm seeing postings all over Facebook about Pepsi's apparent ommission of "under God" in the Pledge on some kind of special can style. If this is true, it's probably worth a mention in the article. DMorris 21:02, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
- A quick Google search seems to debunk this [http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/undergod.asp (Snopes report)--IDuan 21:16, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks. Got to love internet rumors like that. Isn't that considered libel? DMorris 22:03, 4 June 2010 (EDT)