Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Protected"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Yup yup.) |
(Does anyone second the motion?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Hmm, I don't think I want to get involved. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:00, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | :Hmm, I don't think I want to get involved. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:00, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Agreed. The template was used and created and used by two sysops (from what I can see), but apparently, that's not good enough. The sideline is the place to be right now. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ::Agreed. The template was used and created and used by two sysops (from what I can see), but apparently, that's not good enough. The sideline is the place to be right now. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I spoke to TK about it, and here's how we left it. He has no objection to the idea of the template. It's just its sudden appearance, coupled with the marking of his archived talk page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If anybody other than me thinks it is a good idea to use these templates, please suggest it at [[user talk:Aschlafly]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:44, March 31, 2007
"unauthorized? What does this mean?"
It means that TK didn't authorize you. Careful, he's serious (and somewhat confused). This template got me a ban warning with a side dish of harassment. --Sid 3050 21:59, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
- Hmm, I don't think I want to get involved. --Hojimachongtalk 22:00, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
- Agreed. The template was used and created and used by two sysops (from what I can see), but apparently, that's not good enough. The sideline is the place to be right now. --Sid 3050 22:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
I spoke to TK about it, and here's how we left it. He has no objection to the idea of the template. It's just its sudden appearance, coupled with the marking of his archived talk page.
If anybody other than me thinks it is a good idea to use these templates, please suggest it at user talk:Aschlafly. --Ed Poor 12:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)