Talk:Roman Republic

Is this for real? Time for a rewrite. --Hojimachong^talk 20:55, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Leave it to me. But tomorrow, not today.-AmesG_yo! 20:57, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm sickened at the current state, adding some stuff today. Your history-savviness will be appreciated tomorrow though, Ames. --Hojimachong^talk 21:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks Hoji! Rome's good fun. How would I make a Roman History category? I have written a couple Roman articles, as you can see at my talk page. I'm particularly proud of Augustus Caesar.-AmesG_yo! 21:26, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

I think we should stick with [[Category:Ancient Rome]]. Just add that to the bottom of a page, and the category is automatically created. --Hojimachong^talk 21:28, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks again, friend! This will take a long time. Don't expect more than two little sections tomorrow, but they will be high quality.-AmesG_yo! 21:39, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

I call the Punic Wars section, fresh in my memory! --Hojimachong^talk 21:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

HAHA!! it was from history class!!!!! dude that is wrong how long it hasnt been edited. there are lots of people who know about it. i forgot about it. i will ames. haha. i think that is funny. --Will N. 21:02, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

---

I like the idea, Romans were pretty cool.

As you can tell, I am fairly new at wikis. I can't seem to get my reference #1 to match up with the thing in the Reference section. Help please. --Mcpannier 22:20, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Pax Romana (or lack thereof)

Wait a sec. The headings are messed up. What happened to Pax Romana, from 27 BC to 180 AD, Rome was at its climax, it didn't start to fall until after 180 AD. And then it was a 200 year fall. --Mcpannier 22:28, 29 March 2007 (EDT)