Difference between revisions of "Spreading"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added the furniture.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
  
−
A devious rhetorical trick used by debaters or attorneys. The trick consists of overloading the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
+
A rhetorical trick used by debaters or attorneys. The trick consists of overloading the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
  
 
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical trick playing upon limited time scenarios.
 
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical trick playing upon limited time scenarios.
  
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]

Revision as of 06:58, March 29, 2007

Template:Stub

A rhetorical trick used by debaters or attorneys. The trick consists of overloading the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.

In essence, the tactic is similar to a filibuster, another rhetorical trick playing upon limited time scenarios.