Difference between revisions of "Mens rea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (format) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Mens rea is the mental state of a criminal defendant. | + | Mens rea is the mental state of a criminal defendant. In Latin it means "guilty mind". Usually there are four levels of mens rea in crimes, in descending order of culpability: |
| − | + | #intent | |
| − | + | #knowledge | |
| − | + | #recklessness | |
| − | + | #negligence | |
| − | The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. | + | The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. A utilitarian view of justice does not depend on mens rea, while a moral view of justice does. Mens rea usually combined with [[actus reus]] is used to produce criminal liability. |
| − | William Blackstone famously observed, “in order to have a crime, there must be a vicious will.”<ref>William Blackstone, Commentaries 21.</ref> | + | William Blackstone famously observed, “in order to have a crime, there must be a vicious will.”<ref>William Blackstone, Commentaries 21.</ref> However, in the modern regulatory state there are increasing attempts, particularly at the federal level, to create crimes that do not require proof of ''mens rea''. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 17:23, May 2, 2009
Mens rea is the mental state of a criminal defendant. In Latin it means "guilty mind". Usually there are four levels of mens rea in crimes, in descending order of culpability:
- intent
- knowledge
- recklessness
- negligence
The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. A utilitarian view of justice does not depend on mens rea, while a moral view of justice does. Mens rea usually combined with actus reus is used to produce criminal liability.
William Blackstone famously observed, “in order to have a crime, there must be a vicious will.”[1] However, in the modern regulatory state there are increasing attempts, particularly at the federal level, to create crimes that do not require proof of mens rea.
References
- ↑ William Blackstone, Commentaries 21.