Difference between revisions of "Talk:Famous American artists"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(needs to focus on standards)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: OK, working on it. Thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 06:42, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
: OK, working on it. Thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 06:42, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Standards for Inclusion?==
 +
While I'm thankful for your efforts to class this place up with your articles on art and artists, I'm rather perplexed as to how you're choosing the folks you feature here.  While "famous" and "artist" are inherently subjective terms, by almost any standard many of your choices are--frankly--bizarre.  Take the Musicians category, for example--Steve Lawrence and Ethelbert Nevin?  I can't imagine any discussion in which they'd be more famous or more artistic or more influential than a plethora of people ''not'' on the list (from Louis Armstrong to Frank Zappa).  Or the Writers category--you list Bayard Taylor and Stephen King and Chuck Palahniuk, but leave off Steinbeck and Melville and Hawthorne and Emerson and Dickinson and Frost and any number of others?  The other categories have similar issues to some degree or other.  I think you need to focus your efforts, decide on a standard of some sort, and ask for help/opinions.  I am reluctant to make wholesale changes here, as this is largely your baby, but I am more than happy to assist.  --[[User:RossC|RossC]] 22:38, 21 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 03:38, November 22, 2008

Joachin; Rudolf Nureyev was a dancer, not Rudolph Valentino. And Pet. Clarke is a Brit. And when the link to Stephen Schwartz is activated we get the writer. AlanE 22:17, 19 November 2008 (EST)

OK, working on it. Thank you! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 06:42, 20 November 2008 (EST)

Standards for Inclusion?

While I'm thankful for your efforts to class this place up with your articles on art and artists, I'm rather perplexed as to how you're choosing the folks you feature here. While "famous" and "artist" are inherently subjective terms, by almost any standard many of your choices are--frankly--bizarre. Take the Musicians category, for example--Steve Lawrence and Ethelbert Nevin? I can't imagine any discussion in which they'd be more famous or more artistic or more influential than a plethora of people not on the list (from Louis Armstrong to Frank Zappa). Or the Writers category--you list Bayard Taylor and Stephen King and Chuck Palahniuk, but leave off Steinbeck and Melville and Hawthorne and Emerson and Dickinson and Frost and any number of others? The other categories have similar issues to some degree or other. I think you need to focus your efforts, decide on a standard of some sort, and ask for help/opinions. I am reluctant to make wholesale changes here, as this is largely your baby, but I am more than happy to assist. --RossC 22:38, 21 November 2008 (EST)