Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Homosexuality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Agree) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:That's long, long, long. Maybe you don't need to shoehorn in all of Conservative's "homosexuality and ____" pages. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 10:03, 3 November 2008 (EST) | :That's long, long, long. Maybe you don't need to shoehorn in all of Conservative's "homosexuality and ____" pages. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 10:03, 3 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Completely agree, but I haven't read many of them so would rather someone else cut down the list. Would you be able to do it?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:05, 3 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:05, November 3, 2008
I've created this following the discussion on the Homosexuality talk page. Some points:
- Clearly it's too long - at the moment I've put in most of the pages from Category:Homosexuality, but it should be pared down to just the most important pages before it's used anywhere.
- Ideally there would be a better picture - suggestions welcome.
- And as ever, any improvements to design or organisation will be much appreciated.
--CPalmer 07:10, 3 November 2008 (EST)
I've also added it to Homosexual rights advocacy temporarily, so we can see how it looks in situ.--CPalmer 07:17, 3 November 2008 (EST)
- That's long, long, long. Maybe you don't need to shoehorn in all of Conservative's "homosexuality and ____" pages. Corry 10:03, 3 November 2008 (EST)
- Completely agree, but I haven't read many of them so would rather someone else cut down the list. Would you be able to do it?--CPalmer 10:05, 3 November 2008 (EST)