Difference between revisions of "Talk:Samuel Hirszenberg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Hirszenberg’s painting (The Wandering Jew) is considered the second Jewish example of a Wandering Jew painting, after the 1876 self-portrait Ahasuerus by his mentor Maurycy Gottlieb. Avraham Ronen suggests Gottlieb’s painting was a response to Wilhelm von Kaulbach’s antisemitic The Destruction of Jerusalem, wherein a Wandering Jew figure is tormented by raging demons. [http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/ETD-db/available/etd-03272006-123911/unrestricted/BrichettoThesispdf.pdf] | Hirszenberg’s painting (The Wandering Jew) is considered the second Jewish example of a Wandering Jew painting, after the 1876 self-portrait Ahasuerus by his mentor Maurycy Gottlieb. Avraham Ronen suggests Gottlieb’s painting was a response to Wilhelm von Kaulbach’s antisemitic The Destruction of Jerusalem, wherein a Wandering Jew figure is tormented by raging demons. [http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/ETD-db/available/etd-03272006-123911/unrestricted/BrichettoThesispdf.pdf] | ||
| − | + | Also: [http://www.tau.ac.il/arts/projects/PUB/assaph-art/assaph3/articles_assaph3/14ronen.pdf] | |
--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT) | --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:24, October 11, 2008
The Destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, 1846.
(Zerstoerung Jerusalems durch Titus)
by Wilhelm von Kaulbach.
Hirszenberg’s painting (The Wandering Jew) is considered the second Jewish example of a Wandering Jew painting, after the 1876 self-portrait Ahasuerus by his mentor Maurycy Gottlieb. Avraham Ronen suggests Gottlieb’s painting was a response to Wilhelm von Kaulbach’s antisemitic The Destruction of Jerusalem, wherein a Wandering Jew figure is tormented by raging demons. [1]
Also: [2]
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 19:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)