Difference between revisions of "Talk:Achilles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I suggest changing the picture. If a nude man ''can't'' be shown (but then this should be applied to the article Sculpture, specifically to the image of David), ''eit...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I suggest changing the picture. If a nude man ''can't'' be shown (but then this should be applied to the article [[Sculpture]], specifically to the image of [ | + | I suggest changing the picture. If a nude man ''can't'' be shown (but then this should be applied to the article [[Sculpture]], specifically to the image of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:David_M David]), ''either'' another pic ''or'' the same pic, but cut from the waist. Covering some bodyparts was common in [[Renaissance|Rinascimental]] times, but it was done by professional artists, who devoted their whole professional life to that mission. Putting a blurb like that just attract undue attention by children and is an offense to the painter. --[[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 19:02, 2 September 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:03, September 2, 2008
I suggest changing the picture. If a nude man can't be shown (but then this should be applied to the article Sculpture, specifically to the image of David), either another pic or the same pic, but cut from the waist. Covering some bodyparts was common in Rinascimental times, but it was done by professional artists, who devoted their whole professional life to that mission. Putting a blurb like that just attract undue attention by children and is an offense to the painter. --SilvioB 19:02, 2 September 2008 (EDT)