Difference between revisions of "Calabi-Yau"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (wikify - since I don't know what those words are.)
m (wikify, jargon tag)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Let <math>M</math> be a Kaehler manifold. Then <math>M</math> is '''Calabi-Yau''' if <math>c_1(K_M) = 0</math>. If <math>M</math> is a variety, we say that <math>M</math> is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.
+
{{jargon}}
 +
 
 +
Let <math>M</math> be a [[Kaehler manifold]]. Then <math>M</math> is '''Calabi-Yau''' if <math>c_1(K_M) = 0</math>. If <math>M</math> is a [[variety]], we say that <math>M</math> is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
−
All elliptic curves are Calabi-Yau, since they are parallelizeable.
+
All [[elliptic curve]]s are Calabi-Yau, since they are [[parallelizeable]].
  
−
A degree <math>n+1</math> hypersurface <math>M</math> in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math> is Calabi-Yau. For from the exact sequence  
+
A degree <math>n+1</math> [[hypersurface]] <math>M</math> in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math> is Calabi-Yau. For from the exact sequence  
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
Line 19: Line 21:
  
 
==Calabi Conjecture==
 
==Calabi Conjecture==
−
The first [[Chern class]] of a [[Kaehler manifold]] is homologous to the [[Ricci curvature]]. For this reason, Calabi conjectured that when <math>c_1 = 0</math>, there existed a metric on the manifold whose Ricci form identically vanished. Thus, the Calabi-Conjecture, was eventually proven by [[Shing-Tung Yau]].
+
The first [[Chern class]] of a Kaehler manifold is homologous to the [[Ricci curvature]]. For this reason, Calabi conjectured that when <math>c_1 = 0</math>, there existed a [[metric]] on the manifold whose Ricci form identically vanished. Thus, the Calabi-Conjecture, was eventually proven by [[Shing-Tung Yau]].
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Revision as of 23:11, August 7, 2008

This article or section needs to be written in plain English, using plain English that most of our readers can understand. Articles that depend excessively on technical terms accessible only to specialists are useless for our purposes, so writers are admonished to avoid jargon

Let <math>M</math> be a Kaehler manifold. Then <math>M</math> is Calabi-Yau if <math>c_1(K_M) = 0</math>. If <math>M</math> is a variety, we say that <math>M</math> is a Calabi-Yau variety if it has vanishing canonical class.

Examples

All elliptic curves are Calabi-Yau, since they are parallelizeable.

A degree <math>n+1</math> hypersurface <math>M</math> in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math> is Calabi-Yau. For from the exact sequence

<math> 0\to TM \to T\mathbb{P}^n \to \mathcal{O}(n+1)|_M \to 0 </math>

we get that <math>c(T\mathbb{P}^n) = c(TM)(1+(n+1)\omega)</math>. But this implies that

<math> c(TM) = 1+c_1(TM)+\ldots = \frac{(1+\omega)^{n+1}}{1+(n+1)\omega} </math>

from which one easily concludes that <math>c_1(TM) = c_1(K_M) = 0</math>.

Calabi Conjecture

The first Chern class of a Kaehler manifold is homologous to the Ricci curvature. For this reason, Calabi conjectured that when <math>c_1 = 0</math>, there existed a metric on the manifold whose Ricci form identically vanished. Thus, the Calabi-Conjecture, was eventually proven by Shing-Tung Yau.