Difference between revisions of "Diagonalizable"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
−
Given this topology, the set of diagonalizeable maps is a dense subset of <math>M_n(\mathbb{C}^n)</math>
+
Given this topology, the set of diagonalizeable maps is a dense subset of <math>M_n(\mathbb{C}^n)</math>.
 +
 
 +
We can prove this as follows: Every complex matrix <math>A</math> is conjugate to a matrix <math>B</math> in Jordan-canonical form. One can then perturb the diagonal elements <math>b_ii</math> of <math>B</math> by arbitrarily small numbers <math>\epsilon_i</math> so that the diagonal elements <math>b_ii+\epsilon_i</math>of the perturbed matrix are distinct. But this implies that the perturbed matrix is diagonalizeable. Thus, we can find a diagonalizeable matrix arbitrarily close to a conjugate of <math>A</math>. But since conjugation is a length-preserving operation on the inner product space of complex matrices, this shows that <math>A</math> is arbitrarily close to a diagonalizeable matrix. This completes the proof.
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Revision as of 02:12, July 5, 2008

An operator T on a finite-dimensional vectorspace V is diagonalizeable if V has a basis of eigenvectors for T.

Denseness of diagonalizeable operators

The space of complex linear operators on <math>\mathbb{C}^n</math> may be identified with the vectorspace <math>M_n(\mathbb{C})</math> of nxn matrices with complex coefficients. As such, it inherits a natural structure as a topological space.


Given this topology, the set of diagonalizeable maps is a dense subset of <math>M_n(\mathbb{C}^n)</math>.

We can prove this as follows: Every complex matrix <math>A</math> is conjugate to a matrix <math>B</math> in Jordan-canonical form. One can then perturb the diagonal elements <math>b_ii</math> of <math>B</math> by arbitrarily small numbers <math>\epsilon_i</math> so that the diagonal elements <math>b_ii+\epsilon_i</math>of the perturbed matrix are distinct. But this implies that the perturbed matrix is diagonalizeable. Thus, we can find a diagonalizeable matrix arbitrarily close to a conjugate of <math>A</math>. But since conjugation is a length-preserving operation on the inner product space of complex matrices, this shows that <math>A</math> is arbitrarily close to a diagonalizeable matrix. This completes the proof.