Difference between revisions of "Talk:Derivative (calculus)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(stop)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
So the page is at least a little less wrong now, but someone still needs to do something about the max/min section which is, to put it bluntly, very poorly written.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:53, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 
So the page is at least a little less wrong now, but someone still needs to do something about the max/min section which is, to put it bluntly, very poorly written.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:53, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Someone other than you, apparently. Sorry, but I think a red link would be better than what you left us with.
 +
 +
:I have taught SAT math and I earned AP credit for calculus. This was simply unacceptable quality. Do not edit any more math articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:41, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:41, July 2, 2008

What a surprise--once again, a page in desperate need of revision. I'll do my best to delete absurd and meaningless statements, but someone else needs to come here and do a complete rewrite.--Mathoreilly 13:42, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

So the page is at least a little less wrong now, but someone still needs to do something about the max/min section which is, to put it bluntly, very poorly written.--Mathoreilly 13:53, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Someone other than you, apparently. Sorry, but I think a red link would be better than what you left us with.
I have taught SAT math and I earned AP credit for calculus. This was simply unacceptable quality. Do not edit any more math articles. --Ed Poor Talk 14:41, 2 July 2008 (EDT)