Difference between revisions of "Blakely v. Washington"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (with love from ebaums)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In '''''Blakely v. Washington''''', 542 U.S. 296 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that facts, other than a prior conviction, supporting a sentence above the standard sentencing range in a legislatively prescribed sentencing guidelines system must be found be a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
+
LOL INTERNET
−
 
 
−
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the Court decision, while Justices [[Anthony Kennedy]], [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] and [[Stephen Breyer]] and Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]] were in dissent.
 
−
 
 
−
This case concerned a state criminal proceeding.  The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended this ''Blakely'' rule to the federal Sentencing Guidelines in ''[[United States v. Booker]]'', 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
 
−
 
 
−
==External Links==
 
−
*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=02-1632 Case] at FindLaw (registration may be required)
 
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 

Revision as of 23:02, June 8, 2008

LOL INTERNET