Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution and science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I'm willing to collaborate, but only if this means working together. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:06, 17 April 2008 (EDT) | :I'm willing to collaborate, but only if this means working together. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:06, 17 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 18:16, April 17, 2008
Ed, I just wanted to know if you were going to put supporting evidence for the claims for both sides? I will be willing to help you with this article.--Able806 11:12, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
- Just to be clear: the two sides are not liberals and conservatives but "Liberal claims about evolution" and "Science itself".
- This requires careful winnowing out of real science from liberal claims about science.
- The the following things are not science;
- A statement by a prominent, influential organization endorsing or condemning a particular theory (this is politics or PR)
- A public announcement of a refusal to address a critique of a scientific theory, on the grounds that the author of the critique holds offensive views (e.g., is a Christian)