Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sex addiction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Fixed) |
(→Link: Yes, better) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST) | The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST) | ||
:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST) | :I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :: After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:07, March 2, 2008
Link
The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. AliceBG 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
- I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. Philip J. Rayment 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
- After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. Philip J. Rayment 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST)