Difference between revisions of "Talk:Weapons of mass destruction"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Say What?!)
 
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
"a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able to use Weapons of Mass Destruction <i>peacefully</i>"  Does this suggest that using WMDs on your own population is a peaceful use?  Is it possible to have a peaceful use of a weapon of mass destruction? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:13, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
"a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able to use Weapons of Mass Destruction <i>peacefully</i>"  Does this suggest that using WMDs on your own population is a peaceful use?  Is it possible to have a peaceful use of a weapon of mass destruction? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:13, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Maybe one could use bombs as bridge abutments? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:15, March 13, 2007

Say What?!

"a more stable state that does not threaten international order should be able to use Weapons of Mass Destruction peacefully" Does this suggest that using WMDs on your own population is a peaceful use? Is it possible to have a peaceful use of a weapon of mass destruction? --Mtur 17:13, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Maybe one could use bombs as bridge abutments? Crackertalk 17:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)