Difference between revisions of "User talk:SayaSan"
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | < | + | {{Welcome|sig=<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 02:27, 27 September 2007 (EDT)}} |
| − | |||
Gah, I keep forgetting! --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> | Gah, I keep forgetting! --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
:Do we need a unprotected page for [[Protest in Myanmar]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:38, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | :Do we need a unprotected page for [[Protest in Myanmar]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:38, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Sounds like a good idea. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 15:50, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | :Sounds like a good idea. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 15:50, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | You wrote: | ||
| + | :These police have ''already'' attacked the monks for peaceful protest. They've ''already'' used [[tear gas]], and [[baton charge]]s against people who were peacefully protesting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does this mean that using tear gas and baton charges against civilians is ''always'' evil? (Note: not trying to create a new thread, just asking for clarification before I reply on talk main page or on the debate page). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | : I'm tempted to rule this one out under teh [[Categorical Imperative]], but that's always tricky. They certainly are wrong against peaceful protesters, and there's no question that they are wrong here. --[[User:SayaSan|SayaSan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks for the clarification. I will respond in the proper place. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:43, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've known what's going on in Burma for ages. Then again I consume ''Liberal'' media sources. I also consume what I once believed to be ''Conservative'' sources untill I discovered Conservapedia and realised I must infact be some kinda pinko antichrist. | ||
| + | Easy to google for reliable reports. I deliberately chose the State Dept. one. Less likely to be accused of Liberal bias. | ||
| + | Nuff said or I'll get banned;-) [[User:PhilMcAvity|PhilMcAvity]] 17:45, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:27, September 27, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, SayaSan, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, SayaSan!
Gah, I keep forgetting! --transResident Transfanform!
- You are welcome, if you can help me undo my accidental conservative bias.
- So far, most of what I've seen is emotionalism, calls for banning, etc. Can we make concrete suggestions?
- Do we need a unprotected page for Protest in Myanmar? --Ed Poor Talk 15:38, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Sounds like a good idea. Maestro 15:50, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
You wrote:
- These police have already attacked the monks for peaceful protest. They've already used tear gas, and baton charges against people who were peacefully protesting.
Does this mean that using tear gas and baton charges against civilians is always evil? (Note: not trying to create a new thread, just asking for clarification before I reply on talk main page or on the debate page). --Ed Poor Talk 16:39, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- I'm tempted to rule this one out under teh Categorical Imperative, but that's always tricky. They certainly are wrong against peaceful protesters, and there's no question that they are wrong here. --SayaSan
I've known what's going on in Burma for ages. Then again I consume Liberal media sources. I also consume what I once believed to be Conservative sources untill I discovered Conservapedia and realised I must infact be some kinda pinko antichrist. Easy to google for reliable reports. I deliberately chose the State Dept. one. Less likely to be accused of Liberal bias. Nuff said or I'll get banned;-) PhilMcAvity 17:45, 26 September 2007 (EDT)