Difference between revisions of "Talk:Climate cycles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (spelling)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
--[[User:Scientist|Scientist]] 19:22, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Scientist|Scientist]] 19:22, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Whoah, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
+
:Whoa, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:24, September 26, 2007

Violates NPOV. I support AGW theory but this is too much. Currently cleaning up. --Scientist 19:02, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

Brief rewrite completed. I'm going to adopt this page and attempt to improve it. I shall begin plotting some graphs of temperature over the past 400,000 years using data from Vostok. --Scientist 19:22, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

Whoa, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. HelpJazz 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)