Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Ask questions"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(A question asked on the question page.)
(not censored?)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
:Not censored?  Please see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pravknight&diff=prev&oldid=85523670#Question:_Why_is_Leftism_NPOV.3F]  Recently when an editor pointed out "Dominionism", as defined by Wikipedia is "a trend in Protestant Christian evangelicalism", didn't apply to Paul Weyrich because he is Roman Catholic, he nonetheless recieved a community ban so the pejoritives aimed at Paul Weyrich will stick.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:55, March 11, 2007

Hi! Leave any questions you have for us here.

If wikipedia is "liberal biased" I assume it would be because thats the way the world is biased because the people who write for it are not censored unless it is blatently wrong. I came to this site and thought that as the homepage calls it "more accurate" info. Unfortunatly, I seemed to have stumbled on less accurate information. Note, that some articles leave out anything that doesn't have to do with a specific biased message. (Example: the abortion article doesn't even explain what it is, just why it's bad.)

My real question is, why will this be deleated, instead of talked about and adressed on your site?

Not censored? Please see this [1] Recently when an editor pointed out "Dominionism", as defined by Wikipedia is "a trend in Protestant Christian evangelicalism", didn't apply to Paul Weyrich because he is Roman Catholic, he nonetheless recieved a community ban so the pejoritives aimed at Paul Weyrich will stick. RobS 14:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)