Difference between revisions of "Realist school of international relations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The "'''realist school'''" of international relations is an Anglicization of the [[German]] term "'''[[Realpolitik]]'''" popularized by [[Otto von Bismarck]] and associated with [[Machiavelli]]an tactics, which may include either a pragmatic or otherwise non-ideological approach to achieving political ends. Other famous realists were [[John Mearsheimer]] and [[Henry Kissinger]]. | + | The "'''realist school'''" of international relations is an Anglicization of the [[German]] term "'''[[Realpolitik]]'''" popularized by [[Otto von Bismarck]] and associated with [[Machiavelli]]an tactics, which may include either a [[pragmatic]] or otherwise non-ideological approach to achieving political ends. Other famous realists were [[John Mearsheimer]] and [[Henry Kissinger]]. |
The leading international relations website E-International Relations describes the '''realist school of international relations''' thusly: | The leading international relations website E-International Relations describes the '''realist school of international relations''' thusly: | ||
{{Cquote|The first assumption of realism is that the nation-state (usually abbreviated to ‘state’) is the principle actor in international relations. Other bodies exist, such as individuals and organisations, but their power is limited. Second, the state is a unitary actor. National interests, especially in times of war, lead the state to speak and act with one voice. Third, decision-makers are rational actors in the sense that rational decision-making leads to the pursuit of the national interest... | {{Cquote|The first assumption of realism is that the nation-state (usually abbreviated to ‘state’) is the principle actor in international relations. Other bodies exist, such as individuals and organisations, but their power is limited. Second, the state is a unitary actor. National interests, especially in times of war, lead the state to speak and act with one voice. Third, decision-makers are rational actors in the sense that rational decision-making leads to the pursuit of the national interest... | ||
| − | Realism is a theory that claims to explain the reality of international politics. It | + | Realism is a theory that claims to explain the reality of international politics. It emphasizes the constraints on politics that result from humankind's egoistic nature and the absence of a central authority above the state.<ref>[https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/27/introducing-realism-in-international-relations-theory/#:~:text=Realism%20is%20a%20theory%20that,central%20authority%20above%20the%20state. Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory] by Sandrina Antunes and Isabel Camisão, February 27, 2018</ref>}} |
| − | Some call it [[politics]] divorced from [[morality]].<ref>https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/history/european-history/realpolitik/ </ref> | + | Realpolitik is politics based on realism, not idealism, such as [[democracy]], [[communism]], etc. Some call it [[politics]] divorced from [[morality]].<ref>https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/history/european-history/realpolitik/ </ref> In a piece entitled ''Why I am a realist'', Prof. John Mearsheimer said, |
| + | {{Cquote|Realism emphasizes that there is no higher authority in the international system that can come to your rescue if you are in serious trouble and that you cannot depend on other states to come to your aid in the crunch. Indeed, those other states might someday put their gunsights on you. After all, who can know the future intentions of another state? In those circumstances, there is no chance that [[international law]] or [[just war theory]] will save you.<ref>[https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/why-i-am-a-realist Why I Am a Realist], John J. Mearsheimer, Aug 25, 2024. mearsheimer.substack.com</ref>}} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft]] ([[Think tank]]) | *[[Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft]] ([[Think tank]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==External link== | ||
| + | *[https://mondediplo.com/2023/08/02great-powers Great power rivalries: the case for realism], John J. Mearsheimer | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:International Relations]] |
Latest revision as of 17:16, July 31, 2025
The "realist school" of international relations is an Anglicization of the German term "Realpolitik" popularized by Otto von Bismarck and associated with Machiavellian tactics, which may include either a pragmatic or otherwise non-ideological approach to achieving political ends. Other famous realists were John Mearsheimer and Henry Kissinger.
The leading international relations website E-International Relations describes the realist school of international relations thusly:
| “ | The first assumption of realism is that the nation-state (usually abbreviated to ‘state’) is the principle actor in international relations. Other bodies exist, such as individuals and organisations, but their power is limited. Second, the state is a unitary actor. National interests, especially in times of war, lead the state to speak and act with one voice. Third, decision-makers are rational actors in the sense that rational decision-making leads to the pursuit of the national interest...
Realism is a theory that claims to explain the reality of international politics. It emphasizes the constraints on politics that result from humankind's egoistic nature and the absence of a central authority above the state.[1] |
” |
Realpolitik is politics based on realism, not idealism, such as democracy, communism, etc. Some call it politics divorced from morality.[2] In a piece entitled Why I am a realist, Prof. John Mearsheimer said,
| “ | Realism emphasizes that there is no higher authority in the international system that can come to your rescue if you are in serious trouble and that you cannot depend on other states to come to your aid in the crunch. Indeed, those other states might someday put their gunsights on you. After all, who can know the future intentions of another state? In those circumstances, there is no chance that international law or just war theory will save you.[3] | ” |
See also
External link
- Great power rivalries: the case for realism, John J. Mearsheimer
References
- ↑ Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory by Sandrina Antunes and Isabel Camisão, February 27, 2018
- ↑ https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/history/european-history/realpolitik/
- ↑ Why I Am a Realist, John J. Mearsheimer, Aug 25, 2024. mearsheimer.substack.com