| Line 163: |
Line 163: |
| | [[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:17, 19 May 2013 (EDT) | | [[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:17, 19 May 2013 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from [[User:Conservative]] == | + | == More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from <nowiki>[[User:Conservative]] == |
| | | | |
| | (content created by [[User:Conservative]] and subject to Conservapedia's copyright policy) | | (content created by [[User:Conservative]] and subject to Conservapedia's copyright policy) |
| | <div style="margin: 10px; padding: 10px; background-color: #CCC"> | | <div style="margin: 10px; padding: 10px; background-color: #CCC"> |
| − | [[File:Sun Tzu portrait.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him." - [[Sun Tzu]] ]] | + | [[File:Sun Tzu portrait.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him." - [[Sun Tzu]]</nowiki> ]] |
| | | | |
| | A message to Conservapedia's evolutionists re: me/us not reading talk pages or posting to talk pages until [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#Public_notice_from_User:_Conservative_account at least 2016]: | | A message to Conservapedia's evolutionists re: me/us not reading talk pages or posting to talk pages until [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#Public_notice_from_User:_Conservative_account at least 2016]: |
| Line 281: |
Line 281: |
| | ::Since it is pretty much of a future article and a work in progress, I moved the web page into your user space: [[User:GregG/Attacks on arbitration]]. Once you complete your work, we can move it into [[Attacks on arbitration]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:30, 25 July 2014 (EDT) | | ::Since it is pretty much of a future article and a work in progress, I moved the web page into your user space: [[User:GregG/Attacks on arbitration]]. Once you complete your work, we can move it into [[Attacks on arbitration]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:30, 25 July 2014 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please == | + | == Two small requests == |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | I have two small requests: |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please ==
| + | 1. I added a category tag to your [[Greatest conservative corporations]] article. Please endeavor to put category tags on your new articles. |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | 2. I am working on reducing the number of orphan pages which have no other pages linking to them. See if you can link to your new article from related pages such as [[conservatism]], [[Wal-Mart]], etc. |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please == | + | Conservapedia has a lot of orphan pages as can be seen here: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:LonelyPages&limit=500&offset=0 I started the process of the deorphanization of Conservapedia articles today. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:44, 11 October 2014 (EDT) |
| | + | :Thank you for your suggestions. I will endeavor to attempt to find a category for my new articles and find a way to link them in existing articles (to the extent that such articles are not permanently protected). [[User:GregG|GregG]] 16:45, 11 October 2014 (EDT) |
| | + | ::Thanks. One last thing. Try to to have your articles link to other relevant articles. I linked [[Chick-fil-A]] from [[Greatest conservative corporations]] for example. It will increase the user visitor experience if the visitor can explore matters in greater depth. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:48, 11 October 2014 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | ==Edit access during "off hours"== |
| | + | Hello GregG. I wish to be able to edit between |
| | + | midnight and 7 AM Pacific Standard Time since I am free during |
| | + | those hours. Would you please unblock my editing ability during |
| | + | those hours? That is when I have the most free time. I sent an e-mail to conservapedia@zoho.com, cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com but with no reply. |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please == | + | Thank you, |
| | + | God bless. |
| | + | Jefferson Franklin |
| | + | [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 11:10, 9 November 2014 (EST) |
| | + | == Biblical creationism will be strong in 2015 == |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | See: [[Essay: Biblical creationism will be strong in 2015]]. |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please ==
| + | Stronger, higher, faster! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:46, 17 January 2015 (EST) |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | == I may be partly to blame for Cons's most recent binge == |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please ==
| + | See the bottom of my talk page, especially the last screenful or so, starting with "It's a nice day". When people try to talk Cons into more normal activities, he often digs in even deeper, and this was no exception. Do I feel guilty about this, and should I avoid trying to engage with him? No. I'm trying to help him to interact, at least with me, in a normal and sensible manner. Even if Andy were to intervene and shut off his account, he would probably just go to some creationist website and continue. Only the people who actually deal with him on a personal non-internet basis are going to be able to help. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:18, 5 July 2015 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | :That recent edit of yours on main talk was a real slap in the race. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:35, 21 July 2015 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please == | + | == You Maestro!!! == |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | You're a maestro!!!! Your restoration of edits is absolutely fabulous.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 10:57, 26 August 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | :Thanks. I'm currently doing this on an ad-hoc basis, but I can zip up the RSS posts for the edits I do have (which is incomplete) and send it to you. [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | ::That would be wonderful! I can then do the rest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:03, 26 August 2015 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == GregG = Horace, AugustO = Larron on RW, Block me please == | + | == Clickbait == |
| | | | |
| − | now
| + | Why did you use a Conservapedia headline as an example in the page you originated, "[[Clickbait]]"? Is that what you think the Main Page right section is? Clickbait? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:26, 26 September 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | :My opinion is that many of the teapartycrusaders.com headlines (linked to on MPR) are clickbait (which is unfortunate, since I think honest headlines are much better). The other headlines are usually high quality. I don't think clickbait TPC headlines should be so prevalent on our main page, but one particular administrator apparently thinks otherwise. And since my previous attempts to improve MPR have been unsuccessful, I don't bother with that approach anymore. Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 10:10, 26 September 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | ::The title was: "When CNN Said 'It's Ok To Abort Babies', Ben Carson's Reply Left The Whole Room Silent". It may or may not have been a misleading title. Was there an audience for the CNN interview? Probably not, but it is unclear. Given the brevity of the clip and the camera angle, I don't know if there was an audience or not (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence). I think you need a more definitive example of clickbait. I deleted your second example. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:30, 26 September 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | :::I accidentally deleted the whole article. I restored the article with some changes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:48, 26 September 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == More bad news for Kenneth Miller fans == |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Kenneth R. Miller]]'s number one argument in the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]] trial has been shot down as the beta-globin pseudogene appears to be functional.[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/04/an_icon_of_the_071421.html] |
| | + | |
| | + | I hope that further clarifies things. |
| | + | |
| | + | By the way, has Miller gotten back to you about the [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/04/an_icon_of_the_071421.html 15 questions] for evolutionists yet? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:55, 13 October 2015 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Great to see you again! == |
| | + | |
| | + | Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST) |
| | + | :Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST) |